Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

In the Kingdom of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is King

Sid Lowe

King's College, London and the University of London, UK, sid.lowe{at}kcl.ac.uk

This article argues that cross cultural management is dominated by the objectivist paradigm of functionalism which is itself embedded in an ethnocentric western culture characterized by amoral rationalism, affective neutrality and orientation to Truth. The discussion uses research into Chinese culture and Chinese management to contextualize the debate. Western culture, it is argued, is an inadequate vehicle for understanding Chinese culture and management. The scientific sub-culture of functionalism is hegemonic within western social scientific paradigms. The paradigm hermeticism and paradigm `wars' characterizing this contested domain prevent integrative and synthetic views. The approaches of Hofstede and Schwartz exacerbate the problem, resulting in avoidance of an agenda to understand the complexities of culture beyond a western mechanistic, quantitative parochialism. The problem is summarized as attributable to the structural obsession of western social science that results in the denigration of understanding of process. Two possible solutions to this problem are outlined; namely `reform' and `radical change'.

Key Words: Chinese culture • Chinese management • paradigms and methods

International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, Vol. 1, No. 3, 313-332 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/147059580113004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
R. Bolden and P. Kirk
African Leadership: Surfacing New Understandings through Leadership Development
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, April 1, 2009; 9(1): 69 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
S. Lowe, F. Moore, and A. N. Carr
Paradigmapping Studies of Culture and Organization
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, August 1, 2007; 7(2): 237 - 251.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
B. W. Stening and M. Y. Zhang
Methodological Challenges Confronted when Conducting Management Research in China
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, April 1, 2007; 7(1): 121 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
U. Staber
Social Capital Processes in Cross Cultural Management
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, August 1, 2006; 6(2): 189 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing TheoryHome page
S. Lowe, A. N. Carr, M. Thomas, and L. Watkins-Mathys
The fourth hermeneutic in marketing theory
Marketing Theory, June 1, 2005; 5(2): 185 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
M. Veser
The Influence of Culture on Stakeholder Management: Social Policy Implementation in Multinational Corporations
Business Society, December 1, 2004; 43(4): 426 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
T. Fang
A Critique of Hofstede's Fifth National Culture Dimension
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, December 1, 2003; 3(3): 347 - 368.
[Abstract] [PDF]