Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Brahmanical Idealism, Anarchical Individualism, and the Dynamics of Indian Negotiating Behavior

Rajesh Kumar

The Aarhus School of Business, Denmark

The article analyzes the implications of the Indian mindset on the dynamics of Indian negotiating behavior. I argue that the constructs of Brahmanical idealism and anarchical individualism capture the nature of the Indian mindset. Brahmanical idealism reflects the tendency of the decision makers to seek the most perfect solution. Any discrepancies between the realities of the external world and the logic of the inner world as manifested through a search for the ideal solution are not problematical for it is only the inner world that defines the true reality. If Brahmanical idealism focuses on the purity of the mental world, anarchical individualism lays emphasis on the primacy of attaining the ideal solution through absolutist forms of interpersonal behavior. That is to say, since each individual is engaged in searching for the ideal solution, and furthermore, as each individual’s ideal solution is either no better or no worse than that of their counterpart, the attainment of this ideal is problematic because under these conditions cooperative behavior is a rarity. In this sense, anarchic individualism fragments rather than enhances total effort, thereby draining energy away from the system. I analyze the impact of this mindset on the Indian negotiating dynamics and outline the implications of the framework developed here for the theory and practice of cross cultural management. Implications for negotiating with Indian businesspeople are also discussed.

Key Words: bridging differences with Indians • cultural influences • India • mindset • negotiating behavior

International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, Vol. 4, No. 1, 39-58 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1470595804038867


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
E. Pio
Gurus and Indian Epistemologies: Parables of Labor-Intensive Organizations
Journal of Management Inquiry, June 1, 2007; 16(2): 180 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
K. T. Bhal and N. Debnath
Conceptualizing and Measuring Gunas: Predictors of Workplace Ethics of Indian Professionals
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, August 1, 2006; 6(2): 169 - 188.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
T. Jackson and Z. Aycan
Editorial: From Cultural Values to Cross Cultural Interfaces
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, April 1, 2006; 6(1): 5 - 13.
[PDF]